Comments on: Visual Analysis: the Permanent Collection

By: admin

admin — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:25:45 +0000

Thanks for the feedback Rose 😀
There’s only one space between scene and for, it might look like more because of the font though. Of course it’s also possible that I’m looking at the wrong thing. If you could let me know which specific sentences have errors in them it would be greatly appreciated.

By: Julia Dwyer

Julia Dwyer — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:03:32 +0000

Great description, you can really get a sense of the piece and some key design elements that I am excited to hear analyzed.

By: Rosemary Bourne

Rosemary Bourne — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 19:09:01 +0000

While the overall analysis is good for a rough paragraph, it has its grammatical errors in here. For example, there is one part where there is an extra space between the words scene and for. I appreciate the transitions from the description from the analysis, however, I wish you would go into the analysis a bit more. The description appears to have more meat to it. The analysis is a good read, but if you have time to add some more details to your analysis. What else could this picture mean? Did you only have one sole idea for this analysis? What else do you see? Also, I wish that you could have uploaded the picture for me to see as I would love to see these ideas that you are talking about. I can’t wait for your presentation! Good luck!

By: Anna

Anna — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 19:08:14 +0000

It would be interesting to talk about the children more- what are their expressions? How are they being portrayed? Where are they looking? What are they wearing/look like? How are they positioned? Why are they there? Also, the shape of the artwork is interesting. How does the circular frame change the work from the traditional style of art?